Re: [PATCH] Merge non-first refs that match first refspec
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Sep 28, 2007, 05:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070928052548.GX3099@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709280108060.5926@iabervon.org>
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> wrote: > > > Beats me; Junio, what's your test case? > > > > If I understood him correctly it is this: > > > > mkdir foo; cd foo; git init > > git config remote.origin.url git://repo.or.cz/alt-git.git > > git config remote.origin.fetch refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master > > git config --add remote.origin.fetch refs/heads/maint:refs/remotes/origin/maint > > git pull > > > > We should see "master" listed in .git/FETCH_HEAD as a "for-merge" > > and "maint" listed as a "not-for-merge"... > > > > But if that remote.origin.fetch was a wildcard spec this shouldn't > > happen as the results are unpredictable. But above the user > > explicitly put master first, so it should be defaulted to. > > But after that sequence, the right thing does happen. So I'm guessing that > he has some different sequence that triggers a bug.
OK. Then I don't understand what issue Junio identified. And it makes me feel better knowing that the current code does do the right thing in the above case, because that's what I meant for it to do when I was last in there...
-- Shawn.