Re: [PATCH] Add git-rev-list --invert-match
- From
Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
- Date
- Sep 20, 2007, 12:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070920123849.GD12076@jukie.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709201132381.28395@racer.site>
* Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> [070920 06:34]:
Show 5 quoted lines
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > > git log --invert-match --grep="uninteresting" > > IMHO this is only half a solution. Some of us want to say "git log > --grep=this --but-not-(in-the-whole-message) --grep=that".
I have noticed that unique negation flags are getting scarce... we already have --reverse, --inverse, and --not mean something elsewhere. --but-not maybe be good.
I also agree that git-grep could use this extension.
Anyways, I can see four solutions for adding "show me this but not that" functionality to git-rev-list:
1) adding a --but-not flag, as you suggested. It separates positive
matches that precede it with negative matches that follow. Example:
git log --grep=this --but-not --grep=that --committer="${MY_EMAIL}" 2) Adding --not-grep, --not-author, --not-committer which add negative
matches. Maybe even --grep!=PATTERN, --author!=PATTERN, ... Example:
git log --grep=this --not-grep=that --committer!="${MY_EMAIL}" 3) Extending the PATTERN we accept in --grep, --author, and --committer,
such that a prefix in the pattern tells us how to use the match:
--grep=!PATTERN Example:
git log --grep=this --grep='!that' --committer="!${MY_EMAIL}" 4) (going on a limb here) Can this kind of match be done with perl
regular expressions? Maybe we could use --perl-regexp Example:
I've got nothing :)Personally I am currently in favour of 2. It seems intuitive, and unlike option 3, the '!' cannot clash with the pattern. Although 3 has the bonus of allowing other flags like extended regexp, perl regexp, case insensitive, negation, etc.
Comments?
-Bart
-- WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/