Re: State of Perforce importing.
- From
David Brown <git@davidb.org>
- Date
- Sep 18, 2007, 15:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070918154918.GA19106@old.davidb.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <46EF7DD1.9090301@vilain.net>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:27:13PM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
>I'm pretty close to giving a newer one a spin, that actually imports >from the raw perforce back-end files without needing the perforce >server. I am hoping that this should give a very clean import and will >be very fast and efficient, sending files that share ancestry to gfi in >sequence so that the on-the-fly delta system works.
Unfortunately, this isn't something I'm going to be able to use. The Perforce server will remain live, and resides on a machine I don't have access to.
>It could possibly be adapted to use the p4 client (though I'd expect >that to be relatively slow per-revision), and possibly be extended to be >bidirectional as all of the upstream change number information is >recorded, a la git-svn.
I was able to get 'git-p4' to work a lot better by using @all, but it still has some problems, at least bad interactions with P4.
- It doesn't use any client spec. Our P4 server space is a complete
mismash and has to be fixed up to get a sane directory layout. For
example, some revisions have hundred-MB tar files sitting in the root
directory and I don't want that in the repo. I also need to exclude
directories, and in some cases completely rearrange the directory
layout. - Our P4 server is set to be case insensitive. 'git-p4' ignores paths
that come back from the server that are specified using a different
case. Unfortunately, this means that a handful of files just get
randomly dropped from each revision. I tried importing a client path instead of a depot path, but the names
that come back from 'p4 files' are depot based so none ever match. I
end up with a nice revision history of entirely empty trees.I'm probably going to end up writing an importer that uses an actual client workspace to let Perforce do the client mapping. I'm also going to have to put some work into some code to clean up the log messages, since most of our changes have as a first line "New Features:", which makes for a rather uninformative shortlog.
But, I did learn about 'p4 -G' from git-p4 so that will help in getting information from the repository.
Thanks, David