git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Question about git-log --date and default behavior

From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date
Aug 27, 2007, 08:45 UTC
Message-ID
<20070827084544.GA19358@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To
<20070827082750.GD17373@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 04:27:50AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I think changing the default for 'git-log' should be OK, as it's a
> porcelain, but others might disagree.

As Johannes pointed out, at least gitk is using 'git-log' behind the scenes, so this is probably not a good idea. It seems like a bit of a conflict, though, since git-log is supposed to be porcelain (I thought).

-Peff
Previous: Jeff KingNext: Johannes Schindelin
Message 3 of 4 in “Question about git-log --date and default behavior”
  1. Seth FalconAug 26, 2007
  2. Jeff KingAug 27, 2007
  3. Jeff KingAug 27, 2007
  4. Johannes SchindelinAug 27, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.