Re: [PATCH v3] git-apply: apply submodule changes
- From
- Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@liacs.nl>
- Date
- Aug 13, 2007, 09:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070813093740.GA4684@liacs.nl>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr6m8imj6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:24:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org> writes: > > >> - what does ce have to do in this codepath? read_old_data() > >> does not care about what is in the index (in fact, in the > >> index the entry can be a symlink when the path on the > >> filesystem is a regular file, and it reads from the regular > >> file as asked--it does not even look at ce by design). > >> if you have a regular file there in the current version, ce > >> would say it is a regular file blob and you would not want > >> read_gitlink_or_skip() to say "Subproject commit xyz...". > > > > Hmmm... the documentation says that if --index is in effect > > then the file to be patched in the work tree is supposed to be > > up-to-date. > > But that is the job of check_patch(), not this function, isn't it?
Ah... so you want me to check that there has been no type change to the submodule in check_patch (and then I can use my read_gitlink_or_skip as is). Is that right?
Show 15 quoted lines
> >> The type-mismatch case to attempt to apply gitlink patch to a > >> regular blob is covered much earlier in check_patch(). It > >> complains if st_mode does not match patch->old_mode; I think you > >> need to adjust it a bit to: > >> > >> - allow gitlink patch to a path that currently has nothing (no > >> submodule checked out) or a directory that has ".git/" > >> (i.e. submodule checked out). > >> > >> - reject gitlink patch otherwise. > > > > Are you talking about the case where --index is specified? > > Talking about both cases, and the division of responsibility > between check_patch() and apply_data().
I'll do that for the --index case, but I really think it doesn't make sense for the other case. If we're not in a git repo, then the submodule, which may very well be present, is not going to be a git repo either.
What could make sense is to enforce that in the --index case, the submodule directory is either empty or a git repo and that in the non --index case it is empty.
skimo