Re: [PATCH 1/2] merge-recursive: sometimes, d/f conflict is not an issue
- From
Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
- Date
- Aug 8, 2007, 14:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070808143943.12061.qmail@de98ec6b1268cc.315fe32.mid.smarden.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707171812490.14781@racer.site>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 06:13:12PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> When a merge has a d/f conflict on a path which was not touched > between the merge base(s) and the remote HEAD, and the index and > HEAD contain the same version for that path (even if empty), it > is not really a conflict.
Hi, this patch solves the reported problem fine, and it didn't break anything for me yet. Can this still be considered for 1.5.3?
Thanks, Gerrit.