git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [RFC (take 3)] Git User's Survey 2007

From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date
Aug 4, 2007, 05:41 UTC
Message-ID
<20070804054157.GN20052@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To
<200708040250.55180.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been more than a year since last Git User's Survey. It would be
> interesting to find what changed since then. Therefore the idea to
> have another survey.
This is actually a pretty good draft.  I'd say its about ready to
go.  A couple of minor comments:
 
Show 5 quoted lines
> How you use GIT
> 
>     1. Do you use GIT for work, unpaid projects, or both?
>        work/unpaid projects/both/none(*)
>        (*)I use git to interact with some project I'm interested in

I don't understand the (*) point here. What's the middle ground between work and unpaid projects? Paid projects that aren't work? Isn't that the definition of work? Very confused...

>     7. How many different projects do you manage using GIT?
>     8. Which porcelains do you use?
>        (zero or more: multiple choice)
>     -  core-git, cogito, StGIT, pg, guilt, other

I really hope nobody chooses pg. I haven't supported it in a very long time. Might be a good idea to keep it in this survey just to make sure its 0, then omit it from the next survey. :-)

> Changes in GIT (since year ago, or since you started using it)
...
Show 7 quoted lines
>     5. Which of the new features do you use?
>        (zero or more: multiple choice)
>     -  git-gui, bundle, eol conversion, gitattributes,
>        submodules, worktree, release notes, user's manual,
>        reflog, stash, shallow clone, detached HEAD, fast-import,
>        mergetool, interactive rebase, commit template, blame improvements,
>        other (not mentioned here)
Wow.

This community has accomplished a lot since the last survey. That list covers most of the major items over the past year, if not all of them. But I'd never really seen it all written out in such a concise list; there's so much blood, sweat and tears in those topics from everyone on (and off) this mailing list. Reading it now is bringing back a lot of memories for me.

Sorry, I just had a very emotional reaction to seeing how much we have managed to accomplish in so little time. Thank you to everyone who has made this list possible!

Show 7 quoted lines
> Getting help, staying in touch
> 
>     1. Have you tried to get GIT help from other people?
>     -  yes/no
>     2. If yes, did you get these problems resolved quickly
>        and to your liking?
>     -  yes/no
Possible new item:
  Would commerical (paid) support from a support vendor be of
  interest to you/your organization?

Just kicking the idea out there. Some of us have talked about this on and off from time to time, I wonder what our user community thinks of it. I think Sam Vilain was suggesting he sell Git support to my day-job company, so my coworkers could call him and ask him questions, and he could ask me those same questions on #git, then mail me a 6-pack of beer[*1*] for my troubles. :)

[*1*] And sadly I don't drink beer...
 
-- 
Shawn.
Previous: Jakub NarebskiNext: Jakub Narebski
Message 36 of 46 in “Git User's Survey 2007”
  1. Jakub NarebskiJul 25, 2007
  2. Marco CostalbaJul 25, 2007
  3. Steven GrimmJul 26, 2007
  4. [RFC] Git User's Survey 2007Jakub Narebski, Jul 27, 2007
  5. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyJul 27, 2007
  6. Andy ParkinsJul 27, 2007
  7. Jakub NarebskiJul 27, 2007
  8. Andy ParkinsJul 28, 2007
  9. Paolo CiarrocchiJul 29, 2007
  10. Paolo CiarrocchiJul 29, 2007
  11. Jakub NarebskiJul 30, 2007
  12. Shawn O. PearceJul 30, 2007
  13. Jakub NarebskiJul 30, 2007
  14. Paolo CiarrocchiJul 30, 2007
  15. Jakub NarebskiJul 30, 2007
  16. David KastrupJul 30, 2007
  17. Junio C HamanoJul 30, 2007
  18. Jakub NarebskiJul 30, 2007
  19. David KastrupJul 30, 2007
  20. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyJul 30, 2007
  21. Jakub NarebskiJul 30, 2007
  22. [RFC (take 2) Git User's Survey 2007Jakub Narebski, Jul 30, 2007
  23. Shawn O. PearceJul 31, 2007
  24. Jakub NarebskiJul 31, 2007
  25. Shawn O. PearceJul 31, 2007
  26. Junio C HamanoJul 31, 2007
  27. Shawn O. PearceJul 31, 2007
  28. Jakub NarebskiJul 31, 2007
  29. Paolo CiarrocchiJul 31, 2007
  30. Jakub NarebskiJul 31, 2007
  31. Git User's Survey 2007 - web survey siteJakub Narebski, Jul 31, 2007
  32. Paolo CiarrocchiJul 31, 2007
  33. Martin LanghoffAug 2, 2007
  34. Paolo CiarrocchiAug 2, 2007
  35. [RFC (take 3)] Git User's Survey 2007Jakub Narebski, Aug 4, 2007
  36. Shawn O. PearceAug 4, 2007
  37. Jakub NarebskiAug 4, 2007
  38. David KastrupAug 4, 2007
  39. Jakub NarebskiAug 5, 2007
  40. Johannes SchindelinAug 6, 2007
  41. Asger Ottar AlstrupAug 5, 2007
  42. Jakub NarebskiAug 6, 2007
  43. Asger Ottar AlstrupAug 6, 2007
  44. Jakub NarebskiAug 6, 2007
  45. [RFC (take 4)] Git User's Survey 2007Jakub Narebski, Aug 5, 2007
  46. [RFC (final)] Git User's Survey 2007Jakub Narebski, Aug 14, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.