git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: git-apply versus git-am

From
PBPeter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de>
Date
Jul 23, 2007, 17:37 UTC
Message-ID
<20070723173756.GA4626@xp.machine.xx>
In-Reply-To
<46A4E368.7080909@freescale.com>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:20:40PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> applymbox is going away.
>
> That sucks!  I like git-am.  Is there a replacement command that applies a 
> patch and commits it at the same time?  If I use git-apply on a patch that 
> adds new files, I need to use git-add on the files before I can commit it.  
> That's a real pain.

'git am' isn't going away, but as Junio mentioned, 'git applymbox' is. Those are two *different* programms doing roughly the same, but 'git applymbox' is superceded by 'git am'.

-Peter
Previous: Timur Tabi
Message 7 of 7 in “git-apply versus git-am”
  1. Sean KelleyJul 23, 2007
  2. Alex RiesenJul 23, 2007
  3. Junio C HamanoJul 23, 2007
  4. Timur TabiJul 23, 2007
  5. Johannes SchindelinJul 23, 2007
  6. Timur TabiJul 23, 2007
  7. Peter BaumannJul 23, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.