Re: RFC: git pull or git rebase?
- From
- Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2007, 09:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070723093142.GE20614@mellanox.co.il>
- In-Reply-To
- <81b0412b0707230207k2fa33eb3hdc23319d1f8dbd80@mail.gmail.com>
Show 14 quoted lines
> Quoting Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>: > Subject: Re: RFC: git pull or git rebase? > > On 7/23/07, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote: > >However, I wonder whether this happens to others, too. > >Would it make sense to add a branch attribute that says > >"do not pull this branch" or "do not rebase this branch"? > >Maybe even make git do the right thing automatically, > >so that git would look at this attribute and perform > >pull or rebase as appropriate? > > If you have a recent enough git, it will refuse to pull into > a branch for which there is no configured remote branch. > Exactly for a reason like yours.
Aha. I created the tree by git clone, so my master is configured to merge from origin automatically.
-- MST