Re: finding the right remote branch for a commit

From: Matthias Lederhofer <matled@gmx.net>
Date: Jul 16, 2007, 09:14 UTC
Message-ID: <20070716091415.GA31186@moooo.ath.cx>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707160036160.14781@racer.site>

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

Show 22 quoted lines

> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Matthias Lederhofer wrote:
> 
> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Use
> > 
> >     $ git --work-tree "$HOME" --git-dir . init
> > 
> > instead.
> 
> Why _should_ that be necessary at all?  I _already_ told git that the 
> working tree is somewhere else.  It makes _no sense at all_ to treat the 
> cwd as anything else than the GIT_DIR, when --work-tree but no --git-dir 
> were specified.
>
> > IMHO the --bare flag did not make much sense before the introduction
> > of GIT_WORK_TREE and doesn't after, at least not with the meaning it
> > has: why should 'git --bare' mean to use the repository from cwd?
> 
> To the contrary, it makes tons of sense.  If you want to initialise a bare 
> repository, what _more_ natural way than to say "git init --bare"?  And 
> what _more_ natural place to pick for GIT_DIR than the cwd, when you did 
> not specify --git-dir?

Ah, for git init it makes sense to have the --bare flag and also to use the cwd as GIT_DIR when GIT_WORK_TREE is specified.

> > > [descriptions of bugs, that have been largely ignored]

The last paragraphs were for the second and fourth one (git status/add from outside the working tree): it should be possible to fix this but it might be a bit complicated. And if it is done for a few commands probably all commands should support this.

For the third one (git picks up another git repository even if it is inside a 'detached working tree') I have no idea how to fix this. The working tree cannot be recognized in any way. Maybe you can/should use a symlink to the real repository named .git in this case? But this only works as long as you checkout only one repository in the directory.

Show 5 quoted lines

> > Up to now you are supposed to be in the working tree all the time when 
> > using it.  Therefore I'd call these feature requests rather than bugs :)
> 
> Feature requests? WTF? What reason is there for the _requirement_ to 
> specify a working tree, when git does not make use of it?  Hmm?

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean yet. Where does git require you to specify a working tree?