Re: question about git-submodule
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 15, 2007, 13:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070715134212.GH2568@steel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070715115148.GD999MdfPADPa@greensroom.kotnet.org>
Sven Verdoolaege, Sun, Jul 15, 2007 13:51:48 +0200:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: > > Count me out. Junio convinced me instead and having tried the > > subprojects I find it really convenient: I can choose when and what > > should be updated and I can see what _can_ be updated, iff I decide > > to. Subprojects defined in such a loosely way are more flexible then > > having git-pull fetch subprojects by default. > > I agree that fetching should probably be left as a separate operation, > but if you have all the data, then I find it very inconvenient that > every time you switch to a different commit you have to update > all the subprojects separately too.
I found I do _not_ need to do it every time I switch to a different commit.
> Did you change your mind about this part too?
Yep. I have less to transfer (and in fact, the subproject I mentioned is kind of heavy and has a lot of binary stuff in it).
Show 6 quoted lines
> > Sometimes I even want be > > _sure_ the subprojects are completely untouched (I have some critical > > parts in them). > > The update in the superproject would fail if the subproject is dirty > (just as with files.)
Haven't noticed this yet. Merge ignores subprojects. What do you mean?