Re: pull into dirty working tree
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:38:45PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Show 44 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0500, Bill Lear wrote:
> > We have some CVS users who complain that they cannot do a pull
> > into a dirty working tree, as they could under CVS. Here is
> > their scenario: they make a few changes to their code and want
> > to test it out; someone else pushes changes to the central repo
> > that they then want to add to their working tree to test also;
> > they then want to pull in these changes and test everything, as
> > if they had done 'mv stuff stuff-; git pull; mv stuff- stuff'.
> >
> > They would like an option (perhaps a config option) to do a "dirty
> > pull".
> >
> > The git-merge documentation states:
> >
> > You may have local modifications in the working tree files. In other
> > words, git-diff is allowed to report changes. However, the merge uses
> > your working tree as the working area, and in order to prevent the
> > merge operation from losing such changes, it makes sure that they do
> > not interfere with the merge. Those complex tables in read-tree
> > documentation define what it means for a path to "interfere with the
> > merge". And if your local modifications interfere with the merge,
> > again, it stops before touching anything.
> >
> > But my colleagues are still wondering: why can't git just do it as
> > CVS does?
> >
> > I know there are workarounds: I myself documented a set of commands
> > to "put things on a shelf", but they still are whining.
> >
> > I need a convincing argument: not a technical one, but one that is
> > practical (e.g. where CVS would do harm that git is preventing).
> >
> > So, any explanation that I can give them why we can't have a 'git pull
> > --dirty' that moves things out of the way, then does the merge, then
> > moves thing back, aside from that it is stupid?
>
> I suppose the following way would work:
>
> $ git commit -a -m "temporary commit" # save current work
> $ git branch -f dirty # ..in a separate branch
> $ git reset --hard HEAD~1 # unwind this commit
> $ git pull # perform a clean pull
> $ git rebase master dirty # rewrite the work
> <you may have to fix some conficts here>
> $ git reset master # "undo" the commit
okay this is wrong because you would then "live" in the `dirty`
branch. So you'd have to do sth like:
git checkout master
git diff master..dirty | git apply
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org