Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin-add: simplify (and increase accuracy of) exclude handling
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2007, 15:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070611155425.GA9316@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070611150122.GA11020@diku.dk>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this and making these patches. :)
No problem. I had run it across it before and it was on my "look into this" list...thank you for providing a test case. :)
> I think you could even get rid of has_ignored with something like this.
Nope, I had originally wanted to do that, but the dir_struct.ignored list contains _all_ ignored items, not just those that were originally in the pathspec. The prune_ignored call sets uninteresting ones to NULL. That function could compact the list and re-set ignored_nr, but it doesn't currently do so.
An even more elegant solution would be for read_directory to mark whether an ignored file comes from a pathspec, or was found through recursion. That would be more efficient, and it would remove the prune_ignored thing, which is IMHO a little hack-ish.
I don't have time to work on it now, but I might look at it more tonight or tomorrow (but please, if you are interested, take a crack at it).
-Peff