Re: [PATCH] rename dirlink to gitlink.
- From
Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org>
- Date
- May 22, 2007, 05:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070522055939.GG5412@admingilde.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vodkdbvmk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
hoi :)
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:32:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> As an internal symbol, S_IFDIRLNK makes _much_ more sense than > S_IFGITLINK, exactly because it is a mixture of S_IFDIR and > S_IFLNK.
But then we also should be consequent and rename the entire low-level plumbing to dirlink. I don't see a reason to keep both.
For me the S_ macro names are about the file type which is represented by them. The fact that dirlinks/gitlinks are represented as DIR + LNK is nice but not so important that we have to name the macro that way.
-- Martin Waitz