Re: [PATCH 1/2] Update the bash prompt from 'applied' instead of the obsolete 'current'
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- May 21, 2007, 10:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070521101540.GB32510@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <b0943d9e0705210231j75ef2e57o922f7899f4b5814b@mail.gmail.com>
On 2007-05-21 10:31:09 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> My plan is to release a 0.13 version pretty soon but without the DAG > patches as we might have to test them a bit more.
That's reasonable.
> The release after 0.13 I'd like to be a 1.0-rc1 (including the DAG > patches) unless we have some other major changes pending.
It'd be great to do away with the need to "stg init", but that shouldn't really be a major change (but I haven't started looking at it yet). It would be nice if 1.0 had documentation that didn't have to mention "stg init".
> I don't think we can get much slower than this.
Oh yes we can ... :-)
> I modified stg to only load the modules needed for a given command > but it still takes around 150ms for a command like 'top'. I don't > know any other python tricks to make it start faster.
I don't either. We might consider having plumbing written in C or something, and make sure that the plumbing can be called directly if there's need, but it's going to complicate things greatly compared to pure Python.
> BTW, any of you would like to get added as a member to > gna.org/projects/stgit (there are no advantages, only e-mail updates > for filed bug reports)?
Free bug reports? Sure, I'm in! (I just created a Gna! account: kha)
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle