Re: FFmpeg considering GIT
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- May 8, 2007, 04:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070508041939.GK11311@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <17983.63329.314321.305860@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Brett Schwarz writes: > > As Shawn mentions below, he started using namespaces for git-gui. I > > think gitk could benefit from that as well, along with a few other > > changes. > > Gitk ends up handling pretty significant amounts of data. In > particular the per-commit data can get to gigabytes, and processing it > is pretty cpu-intensive. I did try using namespaces for the > per-commit data but I found that the performance hit to be more than I > was willing to tolerate.
If that is the case then an obvious direction is to start using C for the actual Git operations/datastore and Tcl/Tk for the basic UI layout and event handlers.
If we go down that path for gitk then I may wind up doing the same for git-gui. Because gitk would require the tcl/tk heders and libraries at that point, so also requiring them for git-gui wouldn't be too unreasonable.
But fortunately git-gui doesn't have to deal with gigabytes of data; I'm only really looking at the "dirty" stuff, or at worst, the blame for an entire file.
-- Shawn.