Re: 'upstream' branches.
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 5, 2007, 22:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070505225249.GE2898@steel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <1178387429.17680.35.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
David Woodhouse, Sat, May 05, 2007 19:50:28 +0200:
Show 10 quoted lines
> > > > > > Is there a better way? > > > > I would just remove the pluses. git-fetch will say that the branch is > > already up-to-date, if the local branch already has everything the > > remote has. > > Then after I pull from Linus' tree, I can't pull from the mtd tree -- it > complains that the 'linus' branch there can't be fast-forwarded, and > refuses to pull the 'master' branch.
Which got me by surprise (just tried). I though it'd notice that all the commits are already present...
Experts, is it really supposed to be that way?