Re: [PATCH 0/8] git-repack --max-pack-size
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 1, 2007, 08:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200705010926.35265.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7irt9qm1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Tuesday 2007 May 01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Which leaves 'master' right now at v1.5.2-rc1 while 'next' at > v1.5.2-rc1-687-gcb3892c; we might want to do something about > this apparent discrepancy.
It's perfect - I'd say that it's exactly right.
git-describe is for making unique - human readable names for points in history, not for describing the tree. It makes no difference that A and B have the same tree, they are different points.
I've always thought of git-describe as being a way of mapping a commit hash to a nicer looking name. If A and B are different commits then they should have different names.
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET andyparkins@gmail.com