Re: [PATCH 0/2] bookmarks (was: Re: git-fetch and unannotated tags)
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2007, 13:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070426134501.GA3273@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <200704260908.07108.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On 2007-04-26 09:08:06 +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing the point - what do people see lightweight tags as > useful for if not for marking revisions in a not-to-be-published > fashion?
I agree. Lightweight tags intentionally lack all the information that heavyweight tags have: committer/author, date, and log message. This makes them quick and handy as a personal bookmarking system, but less friendly for communication with others: all you have is the name. You can't even know who created the tag, or when, or for what purpose, unless it's all encoded it the tag name.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle