Re: What's in git.git (stable)
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 31, 2007, 11:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070331115458.GC4377@steel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1wj5ycx5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano, Sat, Mar 31, 2007 11:34:14 +0200:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > If you can remind me of patches that are "must have"s for 1.5.1 > that I've missed, that would be very nice. We've broken "git > am" and "git rebase" (without --merge) on 'master' branch for > people who has i18n contents after 1.5.0 but they should be > fixed now.
We still have absolutely broken merge-recursive WRT rename/rename conflicts in intermediate trees.
> Please, remember that the key word for this weekend is "make > 1.5.1 NO WORSE than 1.5.0". IOW, the focus is on obvious > regression fixes.
It is "no worse", but doesn't "pretty bad" count?