Re: basics... when reading docs doesn't help
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- Mar 29, 2007, 21:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070329214654.GI6143@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vabxv3fnx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:26:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:50:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> Now, my copy of Linus' tree was ATM 1.5GiB big... Slowly it's getting > >> scary. > > > > On my laptop: > > > > [bfields@pad linux]$ du -hs . > > 1.5G . > > [bfields@pad linux]$ du -hs .git > > 334M .git > > > > So it's mostly the checked out working directory and build > > stuff. > > > > If you really need a ton of build trees then you might just want to do > > cp -al or something. > > How about suggesting "clone -l -s"?
If you really want to share as much as possible, then I guess you want to share the working trees too, since (as evidenced above), they're at least as large as the compressed history.
Though actually on a second look, clone -l -s produces something that's only 377M. I hadn't realized how much space the build output takes up. So judging from du the 1.5G Guennadi Liakhovetski mentions above seems to break down into something like:
330M .git 380M working tree 750M build output
--b.