Re: Advice on strategy for "temporary" commits
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- Mar 8, 2007, 16:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070308163239.GH22713@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <e1dab3980703080639i4c553e89nb931c2aea45b023b@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:39:46PM +0000, David Tweed wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> Hi, > > I've been working with my system taking automatic > hourly git snapshots of (filtered portions of) my home > directory for a couple of months. Being able to look > back to what files looked like mid-afternoon yesterday, > or on 18 Nov, is proving modestly useful. However, > I'm thinking about adding "temporary" commits every > ten minutes which then get discarded after 5 hours-ish > (in addition to the long-term archival hourly commits). > This is motivated by the desire to have finer granularity > for testing/bisecting short-term regressions but not having > ridiculously fine-grained changes clogging up the > archive long-term. (I'm aware that with the commits > being primarily taken on a timed basis I'll have more > non-compiling changes than is usual in a repository, so > that this may not turn out to be useful in practice.) > > Looking through the git docs, it looks like the most > natural way of doing this is to make the 10-min commits > (via cron & tagging them under a special tag "temporary > commits only" directory) and then use > > git-rebase --onto start-tag end-tag branch > > every so often (via cron again) to chop the older > temporary commits between start-tag and end-tag > out of the database.
You don't want to run git-rebase out of a cron job, because it may require human interaction.
The simplest thing might be to make the temporary commits onto a separate branch, and throw that branch away periodically.
--b.