git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH] Attempt to improve git-rebase lead-in description.

From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date
Feb 17, 2007, 09:31 UTC
Message-ID
<20070217093150.GA25871@spearce.org>

It was mentioned on #git this morning that the lead-in description of git-rebase is very confusing. Too many branch this and branch that in a very short run of text.

This new description attempts to walk the user through the command syntax, while also describing exactly what git-rebase is doing to their repository.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
---
 Documentation/git-rebase.txt |   22 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
index f2ef1f7..a66b2d7 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
@@ -13,11 +13,20 @@ SYNOPSIS
 
 DESCRIPTION
 -----------
-git-rebase replaces <branch> with a new branch of the same name.  When
-the --onto option is provided the new branch starts out with a HEAD equal
-to <newbase>, otherwise it is equal to <upstream>.  It then attempts to
-create a new commit for each commit from the original <branch> that does
-not exist in the <upstream> branch.
+If <branch> is specified, git-rebase will perform an automatic
+`git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else.  Otherwise
+it remains on the current branch.
+
+All changes made by commits in the current branch but that are not
+in <upstream> are saved to a temporary area.  This is the same set
+of commits that would be shown by `git log <upstream>..HEAD`.
+
+The current branch is reset to <upstream>, or <newbase> if the
+--onto option was supplied.  This has the exact same effect as
+`git reset --hard <upstream>` (or <newbase>).
+
+The commits that were previously saved into the temporary area are
+then reapplied to the current branch, one by one, in order.
 
 It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being
 completely automatic.  You will have to resolve any such merge failure
@@ -26,9 +35,6 @@ that caused the merge failure with `git rebase --skip`.  To restore the
 original <branch> and remove the .dotest working files, use the command
 `git rebase --abort` instead.
 
-Note that if <branch> is not specified on the command line, the currently
-checked out branch is used.
-
 Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
 
 ------------
-- 
1.5.0.552.ge1b1c
Next: Jakub Narebski
Message 1 of 3 in “Attempt to improve git-rebase lead-in description.”
  1. Attempt to improve git-rebase lead-in description.Shawn O. Pearce, Feb 17, 2007
  2. Jakub NarebskiFeb 18, 2007
  3. Shawn O. PearceFeb 18, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.