Re: git-svn on a strangely configured (pathwise) subversion repository
- From
AJ Rossini <blindglobe@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 12, 2007, 18:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200702121947.59154.blindglobe@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070212183202.GB21413@localdomain>
On Monday 12 February 2007 19:32, Eric Wong wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> AJ Rossini <blindglobe@gmail.com> wrote: > > Greetings all - > > > > (paths and names changed, but basically correct) > > > > I'm trying to use git-svn as a svn client on a repository which is not > > quite configured in a standard way... i.e. > > Perfectly standard on some corporate networks, unfortunately :( > > > $ git svn fetch > > RA layer request failed: PROPFIND request failed on '/path/to': PROPFIND > > of '/path/to': 403 Forbidden (https://dummy-host-name.com) > > at /usr/bin/git-svn line 2861 > > <snip> > > > The problem seems to be that the Repository Root directory is not > > readable, while the URL is (at least for me, using HTTPS). > > > > This is using > > $ git --version > > git version 1.4.4.4 > > Known problem. This is fixed in commit > 747fa12cef73b6ca04fffaddaad7326cf546cdea > > > Here is what I'm considering: > > #1 - upgrading to the 1.5.0 RC series > > Stop after #1 if you want a sure thing the current 1.5.0 RC series > contains fixes for repositories with only partial read permissions.
Bingo! Thanks, Eric! Drop by for a beverage of your choice the next time you pass through Basel, Switzerland....
Show 7 quoted lines
> > #2 - trying Eric Wong's git-svn branch at > > http://git.bogomips.org/git-svn.git > > Read access in your case *should* continue to work here. More testing > would be good. This branch may not work well if your write access is > not the same as as your read access; which is something I keep > forgetting to fix...
I'll try this in a dummy directory and try to report back in the hopefully near future...
best, -tony
blindglobe@gmail.com Muttenz, Switzerland. "Commit early,commit often, and commit in a repository from which we can easily roll-back your mistakes" (AJR, 4Jan05).