[PATCH] Use nice names in conflict markers during cherry-pick/revert.

From: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date: Jan 15, 2007, 06:41 UTC
Message-ID: <20070115064122.GA12372@spearce.org>

Always call the current HEAD 'HEAD', and name the patch being cherry-picked or reverted by its oneline subject rather than its SHA1. This matches git am's behavior and is done because users most commonly are cherry-picking by SHA1 rather than by ref name.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
---

 This is on top of your prior patch "Use merge-recursive in
 git-revert/git-cherry-pick".

 git-revert.sh |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/git-revert.sh b/git-revert.sh
index c74af99..bb8f1ca 100755
--- a/git-revert.sh
+++ b/git-revert.sh
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ cherry-pick)
 
 esac >.msg
 
+eval GITHEAD_$head=HEAD
+eval GITHEAD_$next='`git show -s \
+	--pretty=oneline --encoding="$encoding" "$commit" |
+	sed -e "s/^[^ ]* //"`'
+export GITHEAD_$head GITHEAD_$next
+
 # This three way merge is an interesting one.  We are at
 # $head, and would want to apply the change between $commit
 # and $prev on top of us (when reverting), or the change between

-- 
1.5.0.rc1.g4494