Re: [PATCH] Detached HEAD (experimental)
- From
- J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
- Date
- Jan 6, 2007, 22:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070106225242.GJ4655@fieldses.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200701062048.15163.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 08:48:15PM +0000, Alan Chandler wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 18:58, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > If we use the word "branches" for things that you can check out and > > commit to, then "remote-tracking branches" are not actually branches. > > Argh! > > > > What would be better terminology here? > > Why can't we use the terms 'local branch' and 'remote branch'. We can > only commit to local branches - you need to push to remote ones.
We'd have to replace "branch" by "local branch" in a lot of documentation, but that could work.
Though what do you call a branch in a remote repository then, if not a remote branch? I suppose it doesn't matter.
--b.