Re: [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Dec 29, 2006, 04:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061229041626.GA12072@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612281710350.19693@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Thank you Alexandre! I looked for the bug for quite some time, but > was never close to the real culprit.
Thanks for fixing this!
Show 6 quoted lines
> +<<<<<<< orig.txt > +======= > +Nam et si ambulavero in medio umbrae mortis, > +non timebo mala, quoniam TU mecum es: > +virga tua et baculus tuus ipsa me consolata sunt. > +>>>>>>> new5.txt
As a side note I lately have noticed that xdl_merge is producing a conflict like the above when one branch added the lower half and the other branch didn't change anything in the area.
I haven't spent any time to try to reproduce it, or to see if RCS' merge utility would automatically merge the file without producing a conflict. But right now it does seem like xdl_merge is producing conflicts when I didn't think it should be.
-- Shawn.