Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 18, 2006, 09:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200612180917.46214.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vac1l1v8e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Monday 2006 December 18 08:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> By definition each reflog entry says "it was pointing at this > object before, and it was changed by this user to point at that > object at this time and the reason for the change was this".
I'm daft. I've realised, pruning doesn't remove the ref, it removes one of the hashes in the reflog. I withdraw my comment.
I'd imagined it' as the opposite of a creation.
000000 abcdef branch created abcdef 000000 branch deleted
Which is fine, except that isn't what prune is doing at all.
> I personally do not think recording "at this point these things > were pruned" makes _any_ sense whatsoever --- if you care about
I think you're right. :-)
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE