Re: Performance problems in diffcore rename
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2006, 06:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061214061652.GA1747@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7iwvatrt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
>
> > But looking at is_exact_match I'm now wondering why we bother
> > to open the working tree file at all here.
>
> You are right. When we _know_ both SHA-1 can be trusted, we
> should be able to do just this, regardless of contents_too
> (whose only purpose is to delay comparing a cache dirty working
> tree file with something else):
>
> diff --git a/diffcore-rename.c b/diffcore-rename.c
> index 57a74b6..677db85 100644
> --- a/diffcore-rename.c
> +++ b/diffcore-rename.c
> @@ -100,9 +100,8 @@ static int is_exact_match(struct diff_filespec *src,
> struct diff_filespec *dst,
> int contents_too)
> {
> - if (src->sha1_valid && dst->sha1_valid &&
> - !hashcmp(src->sha1, dst->sha1))
> - return 1;
> + if (src->sha1_valid && dst->sha1_valid)
> + return !hashcmp(src->sha1, dst->sha1);
> if (!contents_too)
> return 0;
> if (diff_populate_filespec(src, 1) || diff_populate_filespec(dst, 1))
> Have you tested the above patch? I have the exact same one in my working directory right now and its failing a huge number of the tests. At least great minds think alike that we can make this optimization here, but there's something amiss...