Re: svn versus git
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Dec 13, 2006, 23:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061213231754.GD32568@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <elq1c8$37d$1@sea.gmane.org>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Andy Parkins wrote: > > >> Hmmm... I thought that some progress indicator of download/upload was > >> added... guess I was wrong. > > > > You're not wrong, there is a progress indicator, but it's measured > > in "objects" not megabytes. It's got a percentage as well. Neither of these > > things is a whole lot of use if I want to know how much data (in megabytes) > > has been transferred, how much is there left to go and how long is it going > > to take. > > No, what you see is if I understand correctly progress indicator for > local and remote generating pack to send / exploding pack into loose > objects (or not). There was some patch to add download/upload progress > indicator, but I guess it was not applied.
There is one that gets started when the transfer is taking a while, but it shows the total number of MiB transferred and the current transfer rate. I don't think there's a way to tell when it will be done, just that its running and running slower than you might like. :-)
Part of the problem is the remote end doesn't know how many bytes are needed for the pack its sending until after it has finished sending the pack. Sort of a catch-22.