Re: Locked down (but still shared) repositories
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Dec 7, 2006, 20:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061207201625.GA12502@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <45786F5A.6020400@dawes.za.net>
Rogan Dawes <discard@dawes.za.net> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Shawn Pearce wrote: > >In the situation you describe everyone looks the same to the > >update hook... > > See Section 8.2.6.1 > > http://www.unix.org.ua/orelly/networking_2ndEd/ssh/ch08_02.htm > > You should be able to do something similar for git as they do for SSH.
Ok, I just learned something new. Thank you!
Forced commands on a per-key basis would certainly work. I'm not settled on the idea as the end solution, but it does seem to be perhaps slightly better than the setuid approach.