Re: fsck objects and timestamp ordering
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Sep 25, 2006, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060925164855.GC27043@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060925164004.GB27043@spearce.org>
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am having trouble with a CVS repository where the timestamp ordering > > and dependency order are in conflict. It would be best if git didn't > > experience the same problem. > > It would be best if Git didn't experience a lot of the weird stuff > people were able to do to their CVS repositories. Fortunately the > friendly folks on this mailing list have put the better part of a > year and a half into doing just that. :)
Wow, on reread that last sentance seems to imply that the fine people who have contributed to Git have spent the past year and a half making sure Git has plenty of weird stuff contained within it. Which is not what I meant at all. :)
My brain's just not working today (some sort of head cold thing going on). Its probably best that I stay away from anything that requires any sort of logic... such as English.
-- Shawn.