Re: A look at some alternative PACK file encodings
- From
- linux@horizon.com <linux@horizon.com>
- Date
- Sep 7, 2006, 09:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060907090756.30111.qmail@science.horizon.com>
> Support for 'thin' packs would pretty much require mixing IDs and > (relative) offsets in the same pack file.
An alternative would be to create a small "placeholder" object that just gives an ID, then refer to it by offset.
That would avoid the need for an id/offset bit with every offset, and possibly save more space if the same object was referenced multiple times.
And it just seems simpler.