Re: Strange cogito behaviour
- From
- Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 1, 2006, 15:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200608011641.20077.andyparkins@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060801151258.GB3923@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tuesday 2006 August 01 16:12, Jeff King wrote:
> A cogito fetch without a branch specifier defaults to the remote HEAD, > not master. This is the documented behavior (see cg-branch-add(1)). I > agree it is confusing (I also thought it was a bug until I looked it up
Fair enough. If it is working as intended, then I have no complaint.
Show 9 quoted lines
> > The script then continues with > > * Switch repo1 back to master branch > > * Update repo2 > > This time repo2 doesn't change. So I'm more confused :-) > > This is because repo2's master is already at the branch, and repo1 is a > subset of that history. There is no need to merge since repo2 already > contains all of the commits in repo1 (plus another one which is only on > the branch in repo1).
I think I see now. repo2 is neither repo1#master nor repo1#branch because it actually went like this: * repo1 cloned to repo2, repo2#master is repo1#master * repo2 fetches repo1#branch and /merges/ those changes * repo1#HEAD switched to HEAD=master * repo2 fetch does nothing because repo2 is actually repo1#master + repo1#branch, hence is newer than both repo1#master and repo1#branch That explanation seems to fit exactly with the observed results, so would seem to be plausible.
Thank you for your help; I of course withdraw my bug report and apologise for bothering you all :-)
Andy
-- Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIEE andyparkins@gmail.com