Re: git merge (resolve) _is_ stupid
- From
- Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@yahoo.com>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2006, 17:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060731171229.24870.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7j1u88ol.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
I had seen something similar:
Merging linux-scsi into my own branches whereby both had a particular patch (03aba2f79594ca94d159c8bab454de9bcc385b76), git-merge complained that a resolve is needed.
After manually "resolving" the result was identical to either branch (linux-scsi and my own), so in fact the diff was 0.
I found this strange, but due to lack of time couldn't pursue it further.
Luben