Re: [PATCH] Per branch properties for pull and fetch
- From
Martin Waitz <tali@admingilde.org>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2006, 12:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060727120220.GD27593@admingilde.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <8aa486160607270306s3f49a01cq91ef61e2c9f005e@mail.gmail.com>
hoi :)
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:06:34PM +0200, Santi wrote:
> >> could we default the to-be-merged branch to "remotes/$remote/$branch" if > >> that exists?. That could make life a lot easier when using > >> clone --use-separate-remote.
> On the other hand, my patch changes the behaviour only when explicitly > configured, and your proposed default would change the behaviour even > without changes to the config.
that is correct.
The current default is to always use the remote's master branch, right? What do others think: does it make sense to default to the same branchname on the remote side?
It could make life a bit easier if you want to synchronize several topic branches between different sites.
-- Martin Waitz