Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2006, 22:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060709221326.GU29115@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <46a038f90607091426u5a6ea328h2090a876e51725ce@mail.gmail.com>
Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:26:59PM CEST, I got a letter where Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> said that...
> So I have to ask... what are the expected benefits of the move?
I've been meaning to do something like this for some time already; my itch have been the builtins. The tree size _is_ getting out of hand and a little more categorization of the sources would certainly help. Although I'd take a different approach:
libgit/ builtin/ standalone/ scripts/
> In any case, use /interop instead. /scm in the tree of an SCM could be > anything ;-)
I agree on this point.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise. Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam