Re: [PATCH] cast pid_t to long for printing

> Uwe Zeisberger <zeisberg@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> writes:
> 
> > While fixing daemon.c, I saw that there is a call to syslog using %d for
> > pid_t, too.  I fixed that in the same way without further testing and
> > manual reading. I assume that's OK.
> 
> Is anybody using pid_t that is wider than int?  IOW, I wonder if
> it would make more sense to use "%d" with casting to int.