Re: 1.3.0 creating bigger packs than 1.2.3
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
Show 25 quoted lines
>
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>
> > Apparently I have created a repository which v1.2.3 packs about 50%
> > smaller than 'next' does:
> >
> > v1.2.3 (tag):
> > 60M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> >
> > 1.2.3.gf3a4 (an older 'next'):
> > 128M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> >
> > 1.3.0.rc4.g8060 (a fairly recent 'next'):
> > 118M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
> >
> > Repeated packing with 1.3.0.rc4.g8060 doesn't seem to change the
> > size of the pack file, its pretty consistent at 118M.
>
> First try "git repack -a -d f", where the "-f" is the magic one.
>
> Without the -f, git repack will re-use old pack information, which is much
> much faster, but not as space-efficient.
>
> If that doesn't help, it might be time to look at the actual repo, but try
> that first.
So with 1.3.0.g56c1 "git repack -a -d -f" did worse:
Total 46391, written 46391 (delta 6649), reused 39742 (delta 0)
129M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
I just tried -f on v1.2.3 and it did slightly better then before:
Total 46391, written 46391 (delta 6847), reused 38012 (delta 0)
59M pack-7f766f5af5547554bacb28c0294bd562589dc5e7.pack
--
Shawn.