git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH] Updated testcases for stgit pull with merge

From
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
Date
Apr 16, 2006, 20:34 UTC
Message-ID
<20060416203448.10137.69093.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth>
[Sorry for the previous buggy post]

In the previous series, patch 7 mostly demonstrate that I have missed the appearance of the --merged flag in stgit 0.9 push and pull commands, so we could just amend this testcase with that flag. However, it appears that common workflow of forgetting that flag, then trying to undo the failed push, and re-pushing with the flag still shows a problem, as hopefully shown by this updated testcase.

As for the testcase in patch 8, it still demonstrates a problem IMHO: the push without the --merged flag should have failed in much the same way this one does. However, I have seen GNU patch showing a similar behaviour, so it is maybe not stgit's fault.

-- 
Yann Dirson    <ydirson@altern.org> |
Debian-related: <dirson@debian.org> |   Support Debian GNU/Linux:
                                    |  Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
     http://ydirson.free.fr/        | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
Next: Yann Dirson
Message 1 of 2 in “Updated testcases for stgit pull with merge”
  1. Updated testcases for stgit pull with mergeYann Dirson, Apr 16, 2006
  2. Test that pulls a patch creating a file that got modified afterwardsYann Dirson, Apr 16, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.