Re: How to create independent branches
- From
- Peter Baumann <peter.baumann@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 9, 2006, 08:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060409082248.GB4798@xp.machine.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060409081105.GA4798@xp.machine.de>
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 10:11:05AM +0200, Peter Baumann wrote:
Show 57 quoted lines
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:28:58PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > Peter Baumann wrote:
> >
> > > Another question. I'd like to create a totaly independent branch (like
> > > the "todo" branch in git). Is there a more user friendly way than doing
> > >
> > > git-checkout -b todo
> > > rm .git/refs/heads/todo
> > > rm .git/index
> > > rm <all_files_in_your_workdir>
> > >
> > > ... hack hack hack ...
> > > git-commit -a
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better and more natural to go back to first commit? >
>
> If I go back to the first commit, I'll get the following:
>
> first
> / \
> / \
> master todo
>
> That's not what I want, because in the near future I want to merge
> master and todo, but in my case, todo consists of only of one file (lets
> call it file_a), and the master branch has severeal files (file_{a..z}).
> If I go back to first, I have to delete all files file_{b..z}.
> Further file_a from todo and file_a from master are not equal, the share
> just the same name. But in the near future, they will be merged
> together, so they are equal.
>
> If I go with the above branching, I'll _think_ (I may be wrong, please
> correct me if I am) I get a merge conflict or worse, all my other files
> file_a{b..z} are merged as "deleted", wich is wrong.
>
> > Or even empty repository state at the beginning, and branch there?
>
> This isn't possible because the repository already exists and I don't
> know how to go back to the empty repository state. Even
>
> git-init-db
> git branch todo master
>
> didn't work.
>
> > Or make separate repository?
>
> Ok. You got it. In fact, the todo branch alread exists as a seperate
> repository and I'd like to integrate this in my master repository for
> easier handling (diff etc.)
>
> To import todo as a subproject doesn't seem right, because it's not
> something really independent in the view of the master repo and I'am
> going to merge todo _into_ master in the near future.
>
> Any further suggestions?
> Just in case nobody noticed, that's why I asked for exporting the whole repo with git-format-patch in the first place, because I'd like to import the patches with git-am in the totally independent branch.
Peter