Re: Errors GITtifying GCC and Binutils
- From
- Chris Shoemaker <c.shoemaker@cox.net>
- Date
- Mar 25, 2006, 00:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060325003712.GA32320@pe.Belkin>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060324075229.GH31387@lug-owl.de>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> On Thu, 2006-03-23 19:39:44 -0500, Chris Shoemaker <c.shoemaker@cox.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:03:06PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-03-22 17:28:23 -0800, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: > > > It seems there's a patch like > > > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0602/16278.html is missing? > > > ...or we need a better cvsps. Shall I add it and try again / try to > > > continue, or give up on it for now? Though it would be nice to have > > > these two large and important source trees under GIT control :-) > > > > You make want to try the cvsps patch I attached to the email here: > > > > http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11812.html > > [...]
> invalid initial_branch for file bfd/po/BLD-POTFILES.in, probably > from old cache, run with -x.
I guess that error message wasn't quite as obvious as I intended.
That means you have old cvsps cache state hanging around. You can either run cvsps with -x or delete the cache file manually. Those are the files in ~/.cvsps.
Incidentally, I'd recommend doing this in two stages during trouble-shooting. Run cvsps first and verify that you can produce a valid ancestry tree. If it's not-quite-right you can even edit the cvsps output to reparent the incorrect branches. Then run git-cvsimport after you're satisfied with the ancestry.
-chris