git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: efficient cloning

From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Date
Mar 19, 2006, 22:31 UTC
Message-ID
<20060319223111.GA20464@spearce.org>
In-Reply-To
<m3r74ykue7.fsf@lugabout.cloos.reno.nv.us>
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> wrote:
Show 32 quoted lines
> Is there a way to accomplish the effect of this script w/o having to
> download any unnecessary objects?
> 
> ==================================================
> #!/bin/bash
> 
> lt="/gits/linux-2.6/.git"
> 
> if [ $# -ne 2 ]; then
>     echo >&2 "Usage: $0 <repo> <target-dir>"
>     exit 1
> fi
> 
> git-clone $1 $2
> mkdir -p $2/objects/info
> {
>  test -f "$lt/objects/info/alternates" &&
>  cat "$lt/objects/info/alternates";
>  echo "$lt/objects"
> } >"$2/objects/info/alternates"
> 
> cd $2
> git-repack -a -d -s
> git-prune-packed
> ==================================================
> 
> I tried to modify git-clone to add an alternates file before calling
> fetch, but that file just gets deleted.
> 
> I presume I need to clone -s -l the local alternate, re-parent it to
> the new URL and grab anything missing, but how can I assure that it
> results in exactly the same repo as this script?

Exactly right. There was some discussion about this perhaps just two weeks back and it become clear that the easiest way to clone through a thin straw is to use `git clone -s -l' from a locally available repository which is ``close''[*1*] to the remote you are going to actually trying to clone from, edit .git/remotes/origin to have the correct URL: and Pull: lines, then `git-pull origin' to bring down whatever you don't have yet. This won't miss any objects so it will result in the same repository as a clone would have[*2*].

Footnotes:
  [*1*] Here ``close'' means probably related to the same project.
  Meaning if you are cloning the Linux kernel at least start with
  another kernel repository and not say the GIT repository.  :-)
  The more your original repository has in common with the remote you
  are trying to pull from the less that will need to be downloaded.
  [*2*] This isn't entirely true.  During a normal clone everything
  is pulled down into a single pack. Using this strategy the missing
  objects that are downloaded will be loose; a git-repack after
  the pull might be a good idea to pull them into a pack.
-- 
Shawn.
Previous: James CloosNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 2 of 22 in “efficient cloning”
  1. James CloosMar 19, 2006
  2. Shawn PearceMar 19, 2006
  3. Junio C HamanoMar 19, 2006
  4. James CloosMar 20, 2006
  5. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  6. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  7. Petr BaudisMar 20, 2006
  8. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  9. Petr BaudisMar 20, 2006
  10. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  11. Josef WeidendorferMar 20, 2006
  12. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  13. Petr BaudisMar 20, 2006
  14. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2006
  15. Andreas EricssonMar 21, 2006
  16. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2006
  17. Jeff KingMar 21, 2006
  18. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2006
  19. Petr BaudisMar 21, 2006
  20. Josef WeidendorferMar 21, 2006
  21. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2006
  22. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2006

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.