Re: [ANNOUNCE] pg - A patch porcelain for GIT
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Feb 15, 2006, 01:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060215011425.GM31278@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20060215003510.GA25715@spearce.org>
Dear diary, on Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 01:35:10AM CET, I got a letter where Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> said that...
Show 6 quoted lines
> Publishing a repository with a stg (or pg) patch series isn't > a problem; the problem is that no clients currently know how to > follow along with the remote repository's patch series. And I can't > think of a sensible behavior for doing so that isn't what git-core is > already doing today for non patch series type clients (as in don't go > backwards by popping but instead by pushing a negative delta). :-)
New Cogito will automagically do the right thing if you are just fast-forwarding and you are using cg-update - if the branch rebased, it will happily follow (but cg-fetch + cg-merge will NOT and it will fall back to the tree merge).
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Of the 3 great composers Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us what it's like to be the universe. -- Douglas Adams