Re: cg-clean, cg-status improvements
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2006, 23:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060214230237.GL31278@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <1139941032.26723.4.camel@dv>
Dear diary, on Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:17:12PM CET, I got a letter where Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org> said that...
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 16:53 +0100, Petr Baudis wrote: > > I didn't plan to require git 1.2.0 with 0.17, so it would be better if > > you could do the workaround. But if the workaround means significant > > hassle, it's no biggie if git 1.2.0 will be required. > > It turns out a proper workaround can only be implemented in cg-Xlib, not > in cg-clean. It's a bit hairy for my taste (a bash guru could write it > better, I believe), but it's a compact blob of code that can be easily > removed at any time.
Wow, how you managed to simplify and shrink cg-clean sounds really impressive! :)
Thanks, both applied and pushed out.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Of the 3 great composers Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us what it's like to be the universe. -- Douglas Adams