Re: cg-update bug?
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jan 21, 2006, 20:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060121203519.GN28365@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <dqtih0$i80$1@sea.gmane.org>
Dear diary, on Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 04:03:59PM CET, I got a letter where walt <wa1ter@myrealbox.com> said that...
Show 9 quoted lines
> walt wrote: > > ...there is no -v flag for cg-update. Could it be added > > so I can get the old behavior back? > > Thanks for adding the flag, Petr. I tried it on git and > the kernel this morning, and in each case cg-update -v > printed the name of only one file. From looking at the > logs I'm pretty sure there were multiple files updated, > not just one. Does it print all filenames for you?
It prints all the filenames for me, but only the fetched ones. If you fetched without merge earlier, it will list only the newly fetched stuff. That is rather confusing, so now I added also cg-merge -v and cg-update will pass its -v to cg-merge instead of cg-fetch.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Of the 3 great composers Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us what it's like to be the universe. -- Douglas Adams