Re: Possibility of a MinGW version?
- From
David Brown <git@davidb.org>
- Date
- Dec 24, 2005, 16:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20051224164011.GA6737@old.davidb.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <43AD21D7.5060306@op5.se>
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 11:24:23AM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Sven Verdoolaege wrote: > >On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 11:09:39AM +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > > >>The worst trouble you're likely to run into is all the hardcoded paths. > >>They are everywhere and ofcourse use the / for path entity separation. > > > > > >AFAIR, '/' is a valid path separator on Windows. > >It's just command.com (does that still exist?) that insisted on '\\' > >separators. > > Are you sure? I've seen lots of porting patches that transliterate those > to '\\'. Perhaps those who wrote those patches just took for granted > that it was needed, the same as I did.
AFAIK all of the Win32 APIs accept either forward or backward slash as a separator. It has been this way since when they added directories to DOS.
What doesn't always accept forward slashes are commandline utilities that are using '/' as an option separator. Most of them these days will accept the '/', at least in many circumstances.
Dave