Re: Deprecate --cache.* ?
- From
- Josef Weidendorfer <josef.weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2005, 09:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200511161018.19374.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vsltxazyf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 07:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se> writes: > > > Backward compability could be ensured by having both versions of the flags > > around for a while and issuing a warning when the old form is used. > > > > Good idea? Bad? Stupid? Do we want to keep "cache" around? > > I agree that may be a logical move, with proper b/c slack, but I > am not _so_ enthused about this...
Probably, as your fingers are trained. I just tried it to write 10 times as fast as possible: cache, and afterwards index; and writing cache *is* faster ;-)
But for someone new to git, these options must be totally confusing and coming out of nowhere. Not that I use these often - I am a Cogito user.
Practically, the opinion of people using these options often should count, as it will be inconvenient for them. Rare users can look up the man page.
Josef