git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Cloning speed comparison, round II

From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date
Nov 12, 2005, 21:20 UTC
Message-ID
<20051112212030.GH30496@pasky.or.cz>
In-Reply-To
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0511121159470.3263@g5.osdl.org>

Dear diary, on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:13:20PM CET, I got a letter where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> said that...

Show 27 quoted lines
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> > Dear diary, on Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 08:40:11PM CET, I got a letter
> > where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> said that...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > >
> > > >              rsync   git+ssh(*)   git(**)   http
> > > > 
> > > > git.git      0m45s   0m34s        5m30s     4m01s (++)
> > > > 
> > > > cogito.git   2m09s   1m54s (+)    4m30s     15m11s (only single run)
> > 
> > Well, at the time of fetching, master.kernel.org with git+ssh had load
> > about ~3.5 and some wild gzip was eating most of the CPU there. So if
> > the git protocol still manages to be TEN times slower while rsync goes
> > full speed from that machine, I would say that this means the git server
> > requires way too much CPU.
> 
> Look again.
> 
> master.kernel.org was _faster_ than rsync using the native git protocol, 
> despite being under a load of 3.5.
> 
> Look at the numbers: 45 secs for rsync, 34 secs for git protocol to 
> master.

That's git+ssh (not git transport protocol - this DID make a difference at first, I know it's hard to believe) on machine A vs. rsync on machine B.

> Now, I don't know which rsync machine you used (you can rsync both from 
> master and from rync.kernel.org), since you don't say. 
rsync.kernel.org ("... official kernel.org hostnames for each transport.")

So I had this length more detailed benchmark which re-examined git+ssh vs. git on master.kernel.org (good that git-daemon binds to non-priviledged port). However, an embarrassing thing turned out - this seems to be a network problem, actually.

 From kernel.org to machine X, it takes 20s, and from machine X to my
home machine, it takes 20s. From kernel.org to my home machine, it takes
5 minutes. This concerns only the git protocols, HTTP and SSH from my
home machine to kernel.org is fast as usual.  Even stranger, this is the
same for both hera.kernel.org and zeus.kernel.org, while each is at
totally different network.  Tried many times.  Ugh.
Well, so sorry for false alarm.
Your totally puzzled,
-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
Previous: Petr BaudisNext: Linus Torvalds
Message 7 of 8 in “Cloning speed comparison, round II”
  1. Petr BaudisNov 12, 2005
  2. Linus TorvaldsNov 12, 2005
  3. Petr BaudisNov 12, 2005
  4. Linus TorvaldsNov 12, 2005
  5. Linus TorvaldsNov 12, 2005
  6. Petr BaudisNov 12, 2005
  7. Petr BaudisNov 12, 2005
  8. Linus TorvaldsNov 12, 2005

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.