Re: Something looks like CVS modules
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Nov 11, 2005, 10:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20051111105820.GN30496@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <200511111642.25908.lan@ac-sw.com>
Dear diary, on Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:42:25AM CET, I got a letter where Alexander Litvinov <lan@ac-sw.com> said that...
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Friday 11 November 2005 16:28, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Well, what exactly is the problem with just having multiple > > repositories? > > 1. The problem with checkout - single checkout should checkout all needed > modules to build project. Update should also update all modules. The same > with commit. > 2. Tags should be done on all modules. All modules should be able to be in the > same branch.
Then just have only a bunch of directories in your project root, and that shall be your modules. :-)
(CVS modules don't work like that either, do they?)
> And in the same time one module should be able to exists in two or more > projects !
But this is troublesome, and doesn't fit into GIT's model at all. Do you have any concrete example of a scenario where something like this would be useful?
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't.